Skip to content

Menu

Stoel Rives LLP logo
Current Page:TopicsSubscribeHomeOur TeamOur ServicesContact
Search
Close
IdahoSub-MenuIdaho Supreme CourtOregonMinnesotaWashingtonSub-MenuWashington Supreme Court
Subscribe
Current Page: All Topics

Notice of Appeal

The Stoel Rives Appellate Law Blog

Topics

Idaho Appellate Practice

Idaho Supreme Court Update: The Court Clarifies How to Add a Request for Punitive DamagesIdaho Supreme Court Update: The Court’s original jurisdiction is limited, but the Legislature’s regulation of executive rulemaking is notIdaho Supreme Court Update: The Risks of Cross Appeals

Idaho Supreme Court

Idaho Supreme Court Update: The Court Clarifies How to Add a Request for Punitive DamagesIdaho Supreme Court Update: The Court’s original jurisdiction is limited, but the Legislature’s regulation of executive rulemaking is notIdaho Supreme Court Update: The Risks of Cross Appeals

Masthead

Washington Supreme Court Holds That Prosecutors May Seek The Death Penalty Without An Objectively Reasonable Basis For The DecisionNotice of Appeal Announces New Format and Content

Merits Cases

Seeking Absolutes in a World of Probabilities: Washington Supreme Court Finds Mesothelioma to be Risk of Asbestos Exposure Rather than a Certain HarmThe ER Should Not Be a Warehouse for Disabled PeopleDon't Quit Too Soon

Minnesota Appellate Practice

In Reversal, Minnesota Supreme Court Finds State Law Does Not Preempt Proposed City Charter Amendment On Municipal Waste Collection SystemMinnesota Supreme Court Clarifies The Disproportionate Forfeiture Doctrine

Minnesota Supreme Court

In Reversal, Minnesota Supreme Court Finds State Law Does Not Preempt Proposed City Charter Amendment On Municipal Waste Collection SystemMinnesota Supreme Court Clarifies The Disproportionate Forfeiture Doctrine

Notice of Appeal Archive

August Petitions for ReviewCondo Shoppers - Beware of Lurking LiensWash. S. Ct.: Unanimous Jury Verdict Is All About the Deliberative Process

Opinions

Seeking Absolutes in a World of Probabilities: Washington Supreme Court Finds Mesothelioma to be Risk of Asbestos Exposure Rather than a Certain HarmLucky Defendant Gets a New Trial, Appellate Court Doesn’t Get to Rain on His ParadeThe ER Should Not Be a Warehouse for Disabled People

Oregon Appellate Practice

Oregon Supreme Court Narrows Contribution Bar under the Oregon Environmental Cleanup Assistance ActThe Evolving Landscape of Bad-Faith Law in Oregon: A Year After Moody v. Oregon Community Credit UnionThe Mood Swings on Insurer Bad-Faith in Oregon: An Analysis of the Oregon Supreme Court Decision in Moody v. Oregon Community Credit Union

Petitions for Review

Petitions for Review - June 5, 2014“A Crock” of a Trial: Counsels’ Inability to Control Their Behavior Warrants a New TrialDefendants Are Not Entitled To Credit For Time Served For Required Pretrial Constraints By Statute, Equal Protection Principles, Or Double Jeopardy Protection Even Though Differences In Wealth Arguably Lead To Two Sets Of Sentencing Ranges.

State v. Boysen

August 5, 2013 Conference Rulings

State v. Dobbs

The Sixth Amendment Guarantees Criminal Defendants A Right To Confront The Witnesses Against Them, But Not If The Defendant Intentionally Causes The Absence Of A Witness At Trial

State v. Hassan

August 5, 2013 Conference Rulings

State v. Lindsay

“A Crock” of a Trial: Counsels’ Inability to Control Their Behavior Warrants a New Trial

State v. Manion

August 5, 2013 Conference Rulings

State v. Medina

Defendants Are Not Entitled To Credit For Time Served For Required Pretrial Constraints By Statute, Equal Protection Principles, Or Double Jeopardy Protection Even Though Differences In Wealth Arguably Lead To Two Sets Of Sentencing Ranges.

State v. Sweat

Wash. S. Ct. Continues to Get Tough with Domestic Violence OffendersAugust 5, 2013 Conference Rulings

Uncategorized

August Petitions for ReviewCondo Shoppers - Beware of Lurking LiensWash. S. Ct.: Unanimous Jury Verdict Is All About the Deliberative Process

Washington Appellate Practice

Washington Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects the Apex DoctrineWashington Court of Appeals Streamlines Foreclosure ProcessThe Supreme Court Sides With Okanogan PUD in a Dispute Over Trust Lands

Washington Supreme Court

Washington Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects the Apex DoctrineThe Supreme Court Sides With Okanogan PUD in a Dispute Over Trust LandsA Multi Agency Drug Task Force Not Immune from the PRA

About the Notice of Appeal Blog

Learn More

Welcome to the Stoel Rives Appellate Law blog, dedicated to providing those in appellate law practices regular updates on significant decisions from courts of appeal within our regions of practice. It is our goal to build out this blog to be a handy resource for both keeping up to date on new decisions and quickly locating information about past decisions.

Stoel Rives LLP logo
Anchorage•Boise•Minneapolis•Portland• Sacramento•Salt Lake City•San Diego•San Francisco•Seattle•Washington
RSS Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Our Services
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Contact

About Our Firm

Stoel Rives is a leading U.S. corporate and litigation law firm providing high-quality services to sophisticated business clients at every stage of their evolution. With more than 325 attorneys in seven states and Washington, D.C., Stoel Rives is a nationally recognized leader in the energy and natural resources industries. From deals and disputes to compliance and counseling, clients turn to Stoel Rives for their most complex business challenges. Let’s navigate the future together. Learn more at stoel.com.

Copyright © 2026, Stoel Rives LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo